Abacus Group and Medicus IT have merged. Learn more.
Regulatory standards for cybersecurity continue to be an ever-evolving topic for the financial industry. With recent updates to the landscape, including widespread regulations like DORA in the EU and updates to the SEC’s Regulation S-P earlier this year, financial services across the globe are seeing tighter regulation coming their way.
Among the latest updates from July of this year include the Cyber Risk Framework under the Abu Dhabi Global Market’s (ADGM) regulatory arm, the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA).
The regulation’s justification can loosely be traced back to the establishment of the FSRA in 2017. As with most government-backed regulatory bodies, the FSRA enacts legal requirements for standard operations of financial service entities and provides guidance for best practices for ethical action and crime prevention related to the industry. Cybercrime has been of particular interest to several regulatory bodies following the pandemic, and ADGM is no different, having taken strong initiatives against cybercrime in 2021.
In 2023, the ADGM published a discussion paper on IT Risk Management, discussing how the body considered IT Risk Management to be a key factor in managing overall business risk. Later in 2024, they established more specific guidance on risk management, providing additional details on four key best practices: Establishing a Culture of Effective IT Risk Management, Managing an IT Environment, Interacting Securely, and Leveraging Business Embedded Technologies.
This next round of requirements demonstrates the ADGM’s continued commitment to empowering the FSRA in enforcing cybercrime prevention and their alignment with increasing standards for operational resilience seen around the world.
The most critical component of the new requirement is the establishment of a Cyber Risk Management Framework by relevant entities. This is a common feature among many cybersecurity-related requirements, but is often one that is not well understood from a practical perspective.
In short, such frameworks usually include elements of formalized policies and procedures around cybersecurity threats, an approved governance structure within the firm to engage with the framework, and regular review and testing of the framework’s elements to ensure appropriateness for both the firm and FSRA.
For ADGM, we see many similar requirements, though perhaps with a more specific coat of paint for provisions such as a timeframe specification for notifications and senior-level accountability. Additional requirements more unique to ADGM include:
All these requirements will be enforceable by the FSRA as of 31st January 2026.
If your organization is already beholden to other cybersecurity, information security, or operational resilience requirements, you’re in luck – the FSRA is not demanding too much beyond the norm for similar regulations and industry best practices overall.
If you’re starting from scratch, there is a fair amount of work to do - but enough time to do it. Next steps should include:
Although this list may seem extensive, each step is crucial to ensuring the security and compliance of your organization. Many of these efforts can be made in tandem to ensure your firm hits the January 2026 deadline.
As a Managed Service Provider working with highly regulated entities, Abacus places significant focus on building security and compliance into everything we do, and ensuring our managed service offerings help our clients meet the high standards of regulatory bodies. We also offer white-glove security services for unmanaged clients with our highly-accredited offensive security and governance, risk and compliance (GRC) teams.
To learn more about our services and how our team can help you ensure your firm's compliance with shifting ADGM requirements, contact us today.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit
These Stories on Blog